Comparison

195/60 R16 vs 255/40 R17

Compared to 195/60 R16, 255/40 R17 is 4.6 mm shorter and changes the speedometer reading by -0.72%.

Current Tire

195/60R16

New Tire

255/40R17
195/60 R16
255/40 R17

Ground line · scaled comparison

Excellent Fit

Within ±3% — safe for daily driving

Diameter change

-4.6 mm

-0.72%

Speedometer at 100

99.3 km/h

-0.72% error

Ground clearance

-2.3 mm

ride height delta

Sidewall change

-15.0 mm

revs/km: 500.6

Permalink for this comparison:

/compare/195-60-r16-vs-255-40-r17

Detailed comparison

Metric195/60 R16255/40 R17Difference
Overall diameter640.4 mm635.8 mm-4.6 mm (-0.72%)
Sidewall height117.0 mm102.0 mm-15.0 mm
Circumference2.012 m1.997 m-14.5 mm
Revs / km497.0500.6+3.6
Ground clearancereference-2.3 mm-2.3 mm
Speedometer @ 100 km/h100.0 km/h99.3 km/h-0.72 km/h

Verdict: excellent

Within ±3% — speedometer, ABS and traction control should behave normally.

Back to

195/60 R16

Back to

255/40 R17

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

All 16″ sizes →All 17″ sizes →Speedometer error guide →Wheel offset guide →Plus-sizing guide →