Comparison

265/35 R22 vs 295/40 R20

Compared to 265/35 R22, 295/40 R20 is 0.3 mm shorter and changes the speedometer reading by -0.04%.

Current Tire

265/35R22

New Tire

295/40R20
265/35 R22
295/40 R20

Ground line · scaled comparison

Excellent Fit

Within ±3% — safe for daily driving

Diameter change

-0.3 mm

-0.04%

Speedometer at 100

100.0 km/h

-0.04% error

Ground clearance

-0.1 mm

ride height delta

Sidewall change

+25.3 mm

revs/km: 427.8

Permalink for this comparison:

/compare/265-35-r22-vs-295-40-r20

Detailed comparison

Metric265/35 R22295/40 R20Difference
Overall diameter744.3 mm744.0 mm-0.3 mm (-0.04%)
Sidewall height92.8 mm118.0 mm+25.3 mm
Circumference2.338 m2.337 m-0.9 mm
Revs / km427.7427.8+0.2
Ground clearancereference-0.1 mm-0.1 mm
Speedometer @ 100 km/h100.0 km/h100.0 km/h-0.04 km/h

Verdict: excellent

Within ±3% — speedometer, ABS and traction control should behave normally.

Back to

265/35 R22

Back to

295/40 R20

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

All 22″ sizes →All 20″ sizes →Speedometer error guide →Wheel offset guide →Plus-sizing guide →